ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Multi-Omics Analysis Unravels the Impact of Stool Sample Logistics on Metabolites and Microbial Composition.
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Step-by-Step Guide to Successful Multiparametric Microbiota Flow Cytometry.Current protocols · 2026Article
- Investigation of Storage Conditions and Quality Control Markers for Metabolites and Lipids in Human Feces.Metabolites · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human health and the human microbiome are inevitably intertwined, increasing their relevance in clinical research. However, the collection, transportation and storage of faecal samples may introduce bias due to methodological differences, especially since postal shipping is a common practise in large-scale clinical cohort studies. Using four different Omics layer, we determined the structural (16S rRNA sequencing, cytometric microbiota profiling) and functional integrity (SCFAs, global metabolome) of the microbiota in relation to different easy-to-handle conditions. These conditions were storage at -20 °C, -20 °C as glycerol stock, 4 °C and room temperature with and without oxygen exposure for a maximum of one week. Storage time affected the microbiota on all Omics levels. However, the magnitude was donor-dependent, highlighting the need for purpose-optimized sample collection in clinical multi-donor studies. The effects of oxygen exposure were negligible for all analyses. At ambient temperature, SCFA and compositional profiles were stable for 24 h and 48 h, respectively, while at 4 °C, SCFA profiles were maintained for 48 h. The global metabolome was highly susceptible, already changing at 24 h in non-frozen conditions. Thus, faecal microbiota was best preserved on all levels when transported as a native sample frozen within 24 h, leading to the least biased outcomes in the analysis. We conclude that the immediate freezing of native stool samples for transportation to the lab is best suited for planned multi-Omics analyses that include metabolomics to extend standard sequencing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.