ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Hybrid and Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Pathology.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dedicated Single-Branch Platforms for Totally Endovascular Zone 2 TEVAR with LSA Revascularization: A Comparison of Castor/Cratos and Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair with the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Current Revascularization Strategies for Aberrant Left Vertebral Artery During Total Endovascular and Hybrid Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Initial Outcomes of Physician-Modified Inner-Branched Endovascular Repair for Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Olfactory Receptors and Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Disease Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Detection of Aortic Dissection and Intramural Hematoma in Non-Contrast Chest Computed Tomography Using a You Only Look Once-Based Deep Learning Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of endovascular aortic surgery has led to the rise of novel techniques and devices in treating pathologies of the aorta. While endovascular surgery has been well established in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta, the endovascular treatment of the aortic arch represents a new and exciting territory for aortic surgeons. This article will discuss the different aortic diseases amenable to endovascular treatment, currently available aortic arch stent grafts and their limitations, and the future of endovascular aortic arch therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.