ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoinductive and Biocompatibility Assessment of a 3D-Printed Polymeric-Hydroxyapatite Composite Interference Screw.Polymers · 2026Article
- Can the Spatial Heterogeneity in the Epiligament Explain the Differential Healing Capacities of the ACL and MCL?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Should We Accept the Epiligament Theory About the Differences in the Healing Potential of the Medial Collateral and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament?Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture represents a common sports injury that is mostly managed operatively. However, non-operative treatment can also play a role, despite the limited high-quality published data on ACL tear management. Both methods have shown favorable outcomes, but clear guidelines based on high-quality research are lacking. Several factors should be considered and discussed with the patient before deciding on the best treatment method. These include patient characteristics and expectations, concomitant injuries, and clinical evaluation, with laxity or/and instability being one of the most essential parameters examined. This should eventually lead to an individualized approach for each patient to ensure the best possible outcome. This review aims to delve into all parameters that are related to ACL rupture and guide physicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment method for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.