Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39458018›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Is Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography a New, Reliable Tool for Early-Graft-versus-Host Disease Diagnosis?

Lavinia-Eugenia Lipan, Simona Ioanitescu, Alexandra-Oana Enache, Adrian Saftoiu, Alina Daniela Tanase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lavinia-Eugenia LipanUniversity of Pharmacy and Medicine "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Simona IoanitescuUniversity of Pharmacy and Medicine "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-5853
Alexandra-Oana EnacheUniversity of Pharmacy and Medicine "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Adrian SaftoiuUniversity of Pharmacy and Medicine "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Alina Daniela TanaseUniversity of Pharmacy and Medicine "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-499X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI aGVHD) is a significant and life-threatening complication in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Early diagnosis of GI aGVHD is crucial for improving patient outcomes, but it remains a challenge due to the condition's nonspecific symptoms and the reliance on invasive diagnostic methods, such as biopsies and endoscopic procedures. In recent years, interest in non-invasive diagnostic techniques for graft-versus-host disease has increased, with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) being one of them. For this reason, we aimed to examine the potential of ultrasound as a non-invasive, safe, and cost-effective alternative for the early detection and monitoring of GI aGVHD in this review. Our narrative review aims to describe the use of multimodal US that includes conventional US (B-mode and Doppler US) and advanced ultrasound techniques such as CEUS and CRTE for the non-invasive diagnosis of GI GVHD. We browsed several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search spanned 2000 to the present, focusing on articles written in English that reviewed the use of these imaging techniques in the context of GI GVHD. Following our research, we noticed that CEUS offers several advantages, including the real-time visualization of the gastrointestinal wall, assessment of blood flow, and detailed microvascular analysis-all achieved without the use of ionizing radiation. This feature makes CEUS an appealing option for repeated assessments, which are often necessary in monitoring the progression of GI aGVHD. When used in conjunction with conventional gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS), CEUS provides a more comprehensive view of the structural and functional changes occurring in the GI tract, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and allowing for earlier intervention. In comparison to traditional diagnostic methods like tissue biopsy or CT scans, CEUS is less invasive, quicker to perform, and better tolerated by patients, especially those in fragile health following allo-SCT. Its non-invasive nature and ability to provide immediate imaging results make it a valuable tool for clinicians, particularly in settings where minimizing patient discomfort and risk is paramount. However, despite these advantages, there are still gaps in the literature regarding CEUS's full diagnostic accuracy for GI aGVHD. Further research, including larger clinical trials and comparative studies, is needed to validate CEUS's role in routine clinical practice and to establish standardized protocols for its use. Nonetheless, CEUS shows considerable potential to transform the diagnostic approach to GI aGVHD by improving early detection, reducing the need for invasive procedures, and ultimately enhancing treatment outcomes for affected patients.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)gastrointestinal (GI) aGVHDgastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS)

Identifiers

PMID39458018
PMCPMC11508394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.