Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457974›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Effects of Dietary Net Energy Concentration on Reproductive Performance, Immune Function, Milk Composition, and Gut Microbiota in Primiparous Lactating Sows.

Fang Gu, Lei Hou, Kaiguo Gao, Xiaolu Wen, Shuyun Mi, Guoxi Qin, Lijun Huang, Qiwen Wu, Xuefen Yang, Li Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fang GuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0009-0001-8148-3248
Lei HouGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd., No. 135 Qixing Road, Nanning 530022, China.
Kaiguo GaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xiaolu WenGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-7468
Shuyun MiGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd., No. 135 Qixing Road, Nanning 530022, China.
Guoxi QinGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd., No. 135 Qixing Road, Nanning 530022, China.
Lijun HuangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Qiwen WuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xuefen YangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Li WangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Zongyong JiangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Hao XiaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dafeng 1st Street, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8535-3443

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-35Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 2023A04J0131Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2024JJ1004Special fund for scientific innovation strategy-construction of high-level Academy of Agriculture Science R2022PY-QY007Special Project on Science and Technology Innovation Strategy ZX202401-07the National Key Research and Development Program of China no. 2021YFD1300401the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32472928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal dietary net energy concentration for the reproductive performance, immune function, milk composition, and gut microbiota of primiparous sows during lactation. Forty primiparous lactating sows (Landrace × Yorkshire) with similar body backfat thicknesses were randomly allocated into five treatment groups and fed diets with different dietary net energy concentrations of 10.05 MJ/kg, 10.47 MJ/kg, 10.89 MJ/kg, 11.30 MJ/kg, and 11.72 MJ/kg. The results showed that there were no differences in the performance of piglets, while there was a decrease in the daily feed intake of sows (

Indexed as

gut microbiotaimmune functionmilk compositionnet energyprimiparous lactating sowsreproductive performance

Identifiers

PMID39457974
PMCPMC11504852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.