Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457891›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Models.

Xi Tang, Shijun Xiao, Nengshui Ding, Zhiyan Zhang, Lusheng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Average Daily Gain in Three Italian Beef Cattle Breeds.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xi TangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Innovation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-7740
Shijun XiaoNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Innovation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Nengshui DingNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Innovation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Zhiyan ZhangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Innovation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Lusheng HuangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Germplasm Innovation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.

Funding

Major science and technology research and development projects of Jiangxi Provincial Department of science and technology 20232ACF01002National Key Technology in Agricultural Project NK2022110601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional genomic selection models trait individually, neglecting complex trait interactions. Multi-trait models address this by considering genetic correlations, thus improving breeding value accuracy. Despite their theoretical benefits, quantifying these models' breeding advantages across genetic backgrounds is essential. This study evaluates the benefits of multi-trait models under varying population sizes and three levels of genetic correlations (low, medium, high) using simulations based on 50 K chip data from 5000 individuals. In equal heritability scenarios, the multi-trait GBLUP model consistently outperforms single-trait models, with breeding advantages increasing with heritability. For example, with a reference population of 4500, improvements range from 0.3% to 4.1%. Notably, trait combinations with low heritability are insensitive to changes in genetic correlation, with gains remaining ≤ 0.1% across different genetic correlations under low heritability conditions. In differing heritability scenarios, the multi-trait model's benefits vary, particularly enhancing low-heritability traits when paired with high-heritability ones. Additionally, modeling time increases as genetic correlation decreases. The results of this study indicate that multi-trait models improve breeding accuracy but require more modeling time and place higher demands on algorithms and software. We recommend breeding strategies tailored to different phenotypes and genetic backgrounds to balance efficiency and accuracy.

Indexed as

GEBVgenomic selectionintegrated breedingmulti-trait modelsingle-trait model

Identifiers

PMID39457891
PMCPMC11506144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.