Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457813›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Just-World Beliefs, System Justification, and Their Relationship with People's Health-Related Well-Being: A Narrative Review.

Camilo Silva, Víctor Pedrero, Jaime Barrientos, Jorge Manzi, Katiuska Reynaldos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilo SilvaFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5365-7338
Víctor PedreroFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-0861-4432
Jaime BarrientosSchool of Psychology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago 8340575, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-3552
Jorge ManziSchool of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-7156
Katiuska ReynaldosFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-6826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beliefs about a social system help people understand and evaluate their environment and are related to their behavior within a society. When people believe that they live in a just social system and develop positive attitudes about the social and political environment, they experience greater satisfaction and well-being. This phenomenon is known as a palliative effect. Two theoretical approaches that explain support for social and political systems are the beliefs in a just world and system justification approaches. The objective of this review was to analyze the literature published between 2019 and 2023 that addressed the associations of beliefs in a just world and system justification with health-related well-being. The search yielded 2064 potentially eligible articles, 26 of which were ultimately selected. The results showed that beliefs in a just world are associated with a more positive perception of the world and better health outcomes. In addition, people with a greater propensity to justify the system experience higher levels of health-related well-being. This positive association is consistently observed across different social groups and contexts. These findings support the phenomenon of palliative effects attributable to beliefs in a just world and system justification.

Indexed as

healthjust worldsystem justificationwell-being

Identifiers

PMID39457813
PMCPMC11504461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.