Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457760›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Knowledge of Learning Strategies and Motivation to Use Them: Similarities and Differences between School Levels.

Eve Kikas, Ita Puusepp, Mikk Granström, Kaja Mädamürk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eve KikasSchool of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-2337-8930
Ita PuuseppFaculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00170 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-138X
Mikk GranströmSchool of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.
Kaja MädamürkSchool of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-8250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students' motivation to learn and the strategies they use during learning are two important factors that affect their learning outcomes. Some learning strategies are more effective, and some are less effective (deep and surface strategies). Both the knowledge of and motivation to use certain learning strategies depend on students' individual characteristics (prior knowledge) and the context (classroom practices). The aims of the present study were (1) to examine differences between middle and high school students' perceptions of the effectiveness of specific learning strategies and motivation to use effective strategies and (2) to explore relations between motivation, learning strategies, and grades in these two subgroups. The participants were 6287 middle school students (aged 13-16) and 5476 high school students (aged 17-20 years). The students completed an electronic questionnaire during school hours. Their perceptions of the effectiveness of specific learning strategies in certain learning scenarios and motivational beliefs (self-efficacy, utility, and cost) concerning the use of effective strategies were assessed with rating scales; additionally, students' self-reported math and history grades were used. A network analysis was used to examine the relations between constructs. The results show small between-group differences in accordance with the theoretical expectations. The findings are discussed in relation to school level and educational context.

Indexed as

high schoollearning strategiesmiddle schoolnetwork analysisstrategy motivation

Identifiers

PMID39457760
PMCPMC11504996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.