ArticleBiomedicines2024
Management of Foot Ulcers and Chronic Wounds with Amniotic Membrane in Comorbid Patients: A Successful Experience.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct roles of amniotic membrane epithelial (hAEC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSC) in amniotic membrane-driven wound healing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Injection of concentrated growth factors from plasma for treating large chronic lower-extremity ulcers defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic wounds are defined as those with disturbances in normal healing. They involve symptoms like exudate, odor, pain or impaired mobility, severely impacting life quality. In the case of patients with additional comorbidities, these are known to aggravate the healing impairment. Amniotic membrane (AM) is gaining attention for its regenerative potential, as it has shown promise in treating hard-to-heal wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers. This work examines a series of five patients who, while suffering an array of other chronic conditions, were treated with AM for the management of non-healing chronic ulcers. Inclusion criteria involved patients with lesions that have been active at least for six weeks and resistant to multiple treatments, accompanied by complex underlying pathologies affecting cardiovascular, immune or renal functions. Exclusion criteria included untreated active infections and patients undergoing other experimental treatments. The mean age of the patients was 68.4 ± 5.2 years. Wounds were treated once a week with AM, following standardized procedures. The variables measured included pain levels, microorganism presence, wound reduction and the number of AM applications to recovery. The median pain VAS score decreased significantly from seven at the start to two at the end of procedures. Four out of five patients achieved complete epithelialization, while the remaining patient showed significant reductions of 40% in wound size after 14 months. Our results confirm how the application of AM is a safe and effective resource for the management of chronic wounds in patients with serious comorbidities, enhancing patients' quality of life, firstly by reducing pain, later by allowing recovery. Future research, including molecular analyses of wound exudates before and after AM treatment, can contribute to better understanding and fine tuning of this therapeutic resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.