ArticleBiomedicines2024
Real-World Experience in the Clinical Use of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Taiwan: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a serious, progressive lung disease for which treatments are scarce. Pirfenidone has been approved for the treatment of IPF in Taiwan since 2016. This study aimed to gain a better insight into pirfenidone's real-world safety and effectiveness in adult IPF patients in Taiwan.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study, and analyzed data from a small sample of 50 IPF patients treated with pirfenidone.
resultsMost patients were men, with a mean age of 72.8 years (±10.3). They were in physiology stage I or II with a baseline mean forced vital capacity (FVC) of 2.236 L (73.8% of predicted value). After treatment with pirfenidone, the mean FVC decreased by 0.088 L at week 24 and 0.127 L at week 52. The mean 6 min walk test was 325.5 m at baseline, increased by 8.1 m at week 24, but then decreased by 23.0 m at week 52. These changes from baseline did not reach statistical significance. Pirfenidone prevented worsening of cough but did not stabilize dyspnea. During 52 weeks of treatment, the incidence of total adverse drug reactions was 62.0%, with decreased appetite (32.0%) and pruritis (10.0%) being the most common. The adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were decreased appetite (8.0%), nausea (4.0%), and respiratory failure (4.0%). No safety concern was raised by the study. Treatment with pirfenidone stabilized both FVC and the subjective symptom of cough in most patients.
conclusionsThis post-marketing surveillance study demonstrated that pirfenidone is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment in patients with IPF in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.