ArticleBiomedicines2024
Association of Senescence Markers with Age and Allograft Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal aging and its consequences: navigating the challenges of an aging population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesRenal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. In the last decade, the number of older renal transplant recipients has significantly increased. However, these patients are at a higher risk of developing post-transplant complications. Therefore, identifying the suitable biomarkers to predict which older patients are at risk of complications is crucial. Cellular senescence could provide insights into the increased vulnerability in this population and guide personalized post-transplant care.
methodsThis preliminary study involved biopsies from 25 patients with renal allograft rejection and 18 patients without rejection, further divided into older (50-65 years) and younger (29-40 years) groups. Biopsies were collected at different time points after transplantation, and rejection was classified according to the histological Banff 07 criteria. Additionally, immunohistochemistry for the markers of cellular senescence, p27
resultsWe observed that the number of p27
conclusionsOur preliminary data suggest the strong potential of both p16
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.