ArticleBiomedicines2024
Hypertension-Induced Biomechanical Modifications in the Aortic Wall and Their Role in Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHypertension is a major risk factor for the type B aortic dissection (TBAD), while many patients do not manage or regulate their hypertension consistently, leading to stable or unstable hypertension. Currently, the effects of stable and unstable hypertension on the biomechanical properties of the aorta remain unclear. The objective was to identify a blood pressure state that represents a greater risk for TBAD development.
methodsA total of 183 samples (108 axial and 75 circumferential) were divided into three groups. Fatigue tensile tests were carried out to simulate normotension, stable hypertension, and unstable hypertension conditions, respectively. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed; thus, the elastic modulus, energy loss, and the peeling force were assessed to evaluate the biomechanical properties.
resultsCompared with normal blood pressure, the modulus of elastic fibers decreased under stable hypertension (0.05 ± 0.02 MPa vs. 0.11 ± 0.03 MPa,
conclusionsStable and unstable hypertension significantly impair the biomechanical properties of the aortic wall, with unstable hypertension leading to greater damage. Hypertensive patients are recommended to strictly follow medical advice to control blood pressure to avoid a higher risk of TBAD due to improper blood pressure management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.