Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457545›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Novel Technology for Safer and Faster Ablation.

Alejandro Carta-Bergaz, Gonzalo R Ríos-Muñoz, Pablo Ávila, Felipe Atienza, Esteban González-Torrecilla, Ángel Arenal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation in the management of atrial fibrillation: A narrative review.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Real-world strategies for pulsed field ablation using a variable-loop circular catheter: a compendium of best practices from early adopters.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Novel approach to pulmonary vein isolation ablationWorld journal of cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Carta-BergazDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo R Ríos-MuñozDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2446-3045
Pablo ÁvilaDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Felipe AtienzaDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Esteban González-TorrecillaDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Ángel ArenalDepartment of Cardiology, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM), Calle Dr. Esquerdo 47, 28007 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Evidence indicates that rhythm control offers superior cardiovascular outcomes compared to rate control, especially when initiated early after the diagnosis of AF. Catheter ablation remains the single best therapy for AF; however, it is not free from severe complications and only a small percentage of AF patients in the Western world ultimately receive ablation. Ensuring that AF ablation is safe, effective, and efficient is essential to make it accessible to all patients. With the limitations of traditional thermal ablative energies, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel non-thermal energy source. PFA targets irreversible electroporation of cardiomyocytes to achieve cell death without damaging adjacent structures. Through its capability to create rapid, selective lesions in myocytes, PFA presents a promising alternative, offering enhanced safety, reduced procedural times, and comparable, if not superior, efficacy to thermal energies. The surge of new evidence makes it challenging to stay updated and understand the possibilities and challenges of PFA. This review aims to summarize the most significant advantages of PFA and how this has translated to the clinical arena, where four different catheters have received CE-market approval for AF ablation. Further research is needed to explore whether adding new ablation targets, previously avoided due to risks associated with thermal energies, to pulmonary vein isolation can improve the efficacy of AF ablation. It also remains to see whether a class effect exists or if different PFA technologies can yield distinct clinical outcomes given that the optimization of PFA parameters has largely been empirical.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationelectroporationpulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID39457545
PMCPMC11504058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.