ArticleBiomedicines2024
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty after a Previous Glaucoma Treatment.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of combined Hydrus Microstent implantation and cataract surgery on diurnal intraocular pressure range: a longitudinal, retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- New trends in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a critical review.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesRecent prospective studies have shown that selective laser tra-beculoplasty (SLT) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to pressure-reducing eye drop therapy as a first-line treatment for ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. In addition to its comparable efficacy to eye drop therapy, SLT has been particularly effective in delaying the time until a surgical intervention is needed. The aim of our evaluation is to analyze patients who have received SLT following a pressure-reducing procedure. The primary endpoint is the duration until a subsequent interventional or surgical procedure is required.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 98 patients who underwent selective laser trabeculoplasty following a previous pressure-reducing procedure between 2017 and 2023. The statistical analyses included Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimations.
resultsIn total, 122 eyes of 98 patients received selective laser trabeculoplasty following a previous pressure-reducing procedure at the Department of Ophthalmology in Freiburg. The median follow-up period was 381.5 days (range 43.25-862.75 days). Approximately 68% of the eyes did not require another pressure-reducing procedure 365 days after the intervention, while about 58% of the eyes remained without another procedure after 730 days, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. No significant difference was found between the different types of glaucoma regarding the duration until a subsequent pressure-reducing procedure was needed. The study indicated a tendency for patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma to undergo a secondary intervention earlier compared to those with primary open-angle glaucoma (
conclusionsSLT is an effective method even after a previous pressure-reducing procedure for patients in whom further pressure-reducing interventions need to be delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.