ArticleBiomedicines2024
Randomized Phase II Cancer Clinical Trials to Validate Predictive Biomarkers.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe design of cancer clinical trials incorporating biomarkers depends on various factors, including the trial phase, the type of biomarker and whether its role has been validated. This article aims to present a method for designing and analyzing phase II cancer clinical trials that validate predictive biomarkers.
methodsWe propose a randomized trial design where patients are allocated between a targeted therapy and a non-targeted therapy stratified by biomarker status. Tumor response is used as the primary endpoint to validate the biomarker through interaction testing between treatment and biomarker positivity. Additionally we propose a sample size calculation method for this design, considering two types of interaction: one based on logit-transformed response rates and the other on raw response rates.
resultsThe proposed sample size method is applied to the design of a real randomized phase II trial. Extensive simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of the test statistic and the sample size method under different scenarios.
conclusionsOur method provides a practical approach to validating predictive biomarkers in phase II cancer trials. The simulations demonstrate robust performance for both interaction models, offering guidance for the sample size selection and analysis strategy in biomarker-stratified trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.