ArticleGenes2024
Peculiar
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is widely accepted that the 3D chromatin organization in human cell nuclei is not random and recent investigations point towards an interactive relation of epigenetic functioning and chromatin (re-)organization. Although chromatin organization seems to be the result of self-organization of the entirety of all molecules available in the cell nucleus, a general question remains open as to what extent chromatin organization might additionally be predetermined by the DNA sequence and, if so, if there are characteristic differences that distinguish typical regions involved in dysfunction-related aberrations from normal ones, since typical DNA breakpoint regions involved in disease-related chromosome aberrations are not randomly distributed along the DNA sequence.
methodsHighly conserved
resultsA positive correlation between
conclusionsOur findings might show that ReDFAS are associated with instable regions of the genome and regions with many chromatin contacts which is in line with current research indicating that chromatin loop anchor points lead to genomic instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.