Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457341›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Examining the Complex Interaction Among Technological Innovation, Company Performance, and Occupational Safety and Health: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Gaia Vitrano, Guido J L Micheli, Francesca Marazzini, Valeria Panio, Angelo Castaldo, Alessia Marrocco, Stefano Signorini, Alessandro Marinaccio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaia VitranoDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4737-7556
Guido J L MicheliDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4459-9305
Francesca MarazziniDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Valeria PanioDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Angelo CastaldoDepartment of Juridical and Economic Studies, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Alessia MarroccoDepartment of Juridical and Economic Studies, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Stefano SignoriniDepartment of Medicine, Epidemiology, Occupational & Environmental Hygiene, National Institute for the Insurance of Work-Related Injuries (INAIL), 00144 Roma, Italy.
Alessandro MarinaccioDepartment of Medicine, Epidemiology, Occupational & Environmental Hygiene, National Institute for the Insurance of Work-Related Injuries (INAIL), 00144 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-2137

Funding

Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro BRIC ID 26/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological innovation and Industry 5.0 are gaining increasing attention among researchers as they offer companies a significant competitive advantage. On the other hand, introducing these technologies also brings new risks for workers. The current literature reveals a lack of studies that effectively integrate occupational safety and health (OSH) within this emerging technological context and analyse the impacts of their use. This study aims to explore how companies interact with macro-level interventions that promote technological innovation and to understand their impact on different dimensions of company performance, including aspects related to OSH. Based on the existing literature, a research framework is presented that identifies the stakeholders involved, the inputs facilitating their interaction, and the cascading effects and changes. A mixed-methods approach was adopted by employing an in-depth survey with 89 companies responding and composed of both open-ended questions, to capture rich, qualitative insights, and multiple-choice questions, to gather quantifiable data. Two change levels have been identified: general changes and specific changes related to OSH. The analysis also delved into the main drivers and barriers that lead companies to engage with technological improvements and the multiple changes these interventions generate across company dimensions.

Indexed as

InventionsOccupational HealthHumansIndustrySurveys and QuestionnairesTechnologybarrierschangesdriversimpactIndustry 5.0interventionsoccupational healthoccupational safetytechnological innovation

Identifiers

PMID39457341
PMCPMC11506840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.