Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457319›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Developing Self-Compassion in Healthcare Professionals Utilising a Brief Online Intervention: A Randomised Waitlist Control Trial.

Amanda Super, Joanna Yarker, Rachel Lewis, Samuel Keightley, Denvar Summers, Fehmidah Munir

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Workplace Mental Health Programs for Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda SuperAmanda Super Consulting Ltd., Manchester M25 9PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0820-4326
Joanna YarkerBirkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7JL, UK.
Rachel LewisBirkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-7301
Samuel KeightleyKing's College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Denvar SummersSchool of Health & Psychological Sciences, City St. George's, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-6627
Fehmidah MunirWork and Health Research Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Spinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The level of stress experienced by staff in the healthcare sector is highly prevalent and well documented. Self-compassion may support the health and wellbeing of individuals and enable them to stay well at work. This study aimed to understand whether a brief, online, self-guided, novel intervention improved the health and wellbeing of healthcare professionals. (2) Methods: In a parallel randomised controlled trial, a volunteer sample of healthcare professionals were assigned to an intervention group (

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEmpathyHealth PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthealthcare professionalsonline interventionrandomised waitlist control trialself-compassionstress managementworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39457319
PMCPMC11507424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.