Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457290›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Analysis of Mpox by Occupation and Industry in Seven U.S. Jurisdictions, May 2022-March 2023.

Matthew R Groenewold, Marie A de Perio, Kyle M Moller, David Bui, Kayla Saadeh, William Still, Ie Meh, Antionette Lavender, Susan Soliva, Caitlin Fields and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Matthew R GroenewoldNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-7813
Marie A de PerioNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-8422
Kyle M MollerNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30345, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4279-9028
David BuiCalifornia Department for Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Kayla SaadehCalifornia Department for Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
William StillDistrict of Columbia Department of Health, Washington, DC 20002, USA.
Ie MehDistrict of Columbia Department of Health, Washington, DC 20002, USA.
Antionette LavenderGeorgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30334, USA.
Susan SolivaMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02130, USA.
Caitlin FieldsMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02130, USA.
Brandi HopkinsMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02130, USA.
Angela K LaramieMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02130, USA.
Pauline HarringtonMichigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI 48909, USA.
Allen StoutMichigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI 48909, USA.
Cheri LevensonWashington State Department of Health, Tumwater, WA 98501, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1505-7287
Collin R MorrisWisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI 53703, USA.
Paul D CreswellWisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI 53703, USA.
Hannah E SegaloffWisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI 53703, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4716-7468
Nicholas J SomervilleNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Chad H DowellNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30345, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-0255
Lisa J DelaneyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30345, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-0601-1494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During responses to outbreaks, the collection and analysis of data on employed case patients' industry and occupation are necessary to better understand the relationship between work and health outcomes. The occurrence of mpox by occupation and industry has not previously been assessed in the context of the 2022 outbreak. We analyzed employment data from 2548 mpox cases reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from surveillance systems in seven U.S. jurisdictions and population-based reference data on employment patterns from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to describe the differential proportionate distribution of cases across occupation and industry groups using the proportionate morbidity ratio. In gender-specific analyses, we found that men employed in certain occupations and industries had a higher relative risk of mpox than others. While occupational transmission cannot be ruled out, it is more likely that individuals with personal and behavioral risk factors for mpox were more likely to work in these occupations and industries. This analysis provides an example of collecting and analyzing occupation and industry data in case reports to understand possible differences in risk by occupation and industry in infectious disease outbreak investigation and help inform resource allocation, messaging, and response.

Indexed as

IndustryOccupationsAdolescentAdultDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adultepidemicindustrymonkeypoxmpoxoccupationsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID39457290
PMCPMC11507617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.