Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457263›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Investigating Pregnant Women's Attitudes toward Herbal Remedies: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Deniz Al-Tawalbeh, Falastine Hamdan, Eshraq Al-Momani, Huda Atiyeh, Amal Mayyas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deniz Al-TawalbehDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-1134
Falastine HamdanFaculty of Nursing, Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt 19117, Jordan.
Eshraq Al-MomaniDepartment of Applied Science, Irbid University College, Balqa Applied University, Irbid 1293, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-9720
Huda AtiyehDepartment of Adult Health, Nursing College, Zarqa University, Zarqa 2000, Jordan.
Amal MayyasFaculty of Health Science, American University of Madaba, Madaba 11821, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHerbal remedies play a significant role in daily life, regardless of region or ethnicity. While they offer various health benefits, they may also pose risks, including toxicity and undesirable side effects. Pregnant women, one of the most vulnerable populations, frequently use herbal remedies, often without informing their healthcare providers, which can lead to unforeseen consequences for both the mother and the fetus.

methodA total of 590 women participated in an online survey designed to assess demographic factors, awareness of herbal remedies during pregnancy, and the potential impact of these remedies on maternal and fetal health.

resultsThe survey revealed that 35.8% of the participants used herbal remedies during pregnancy. The most common reasons for their use were beliefs in their safety and family recommendations. Anise (

conclusionsThe findings indicate that pregnant women generally have limited knowledge about herbal remedies and their potential risks. To mitigate this, it is essential to develop and disseminate comprehensive safety and efficacy guidelines. Both physicians and pregnant women should be well-informed to ensure the protection of maternal and fetal health.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPhytotherapyPlant PreparationsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultPlant Preparationsethnopharmacologyherbal remediesinfantspregnancysafety

Identifiers

PMID39457263
PMCPMC11506863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.