Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457257›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Adaptation of the Nursing Activities Score in Latvia.

Olga Cerela-Boltunova, Inga Millere, Ingrida Trups-Kalne

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga Cerela-BoltunovaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-2005
Inga MillereDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Ingrida Trups-KalnePsychology Laboratory, Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.

Funding

Riga Stradiņš University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the adaptation and validation of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) for use in Latvian intensive care units (ICUs) to measure nursing workload. The NAS, widely used internationally, was selected for its comprehensive ability to reflect 81% of ICU nursing activities, making it a suitable tool for assessing nursing workload in the Latvian healthcare context. The study followed a two-phase methodology: (1) expert validation using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and (2) a pilot study to assess the psychometric properties of the adapted tool. In the first phase, 10 ICU nursing experts assessed the translated NAS items, resulting in revisions to three specific paragraphs (4a, 14, and 20) based on low CVI scores. After refinement, CVIs improved from 0.6 to 0.8 for paragraphs 4a and 14, and from 0.5 to 0.9 for paragraph 20. The final CVI for all items reached 0.909. In the second phase, a pilot study was conducted in a Latvian ICU with 42 patients and 226 NAS assessments. The psychometric evaluation showed strong reliability and validity, confirming the NAS's suitability for measuring nursing workload in this context. Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.973. The adapted NAS provides a standardised method for workload assessment in Latvian ICUs, offering potential improvements in nurse resource management and patient care.

Indexed as

PsychometricsWorkloadAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLatviaMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesadaptationcontent validityintensive careLatvianurse workloadNursing Activities Score

Identifiers

PMID39457257
PMCPMC11507993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.