ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Could a Two-Staged Repair Be the Solution to the Dilemma of Repair Timing for Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a significant challenge, particularly in severe cases with persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) and hypoplastic lungs and heart. For patients unresponsive to conventional therapies, ECMO is required. While the surgical repair is relatively simple, determining the optimal timing for surgery in patients requiring ECMO is particularly challenging. This review explores the dilemma of surgical timing and proposes a two-staged approach: a reduction in herniated organs and the creation of a silo to relieve abdominal pressure before initiating ECMO, with defect closure following ECMO decannulation. RECENT
findingsStudies support pre-, on-, and post-ECMO repair, each with its own risks and benefits. Pre-ECMO repair may enhance ECMO efficacy by relieving organ compression but poses risks due to instability. Post-ECMO repair is safer but may result in losing the chance to repair. On-ECMO repair has significant hemorrhage risks, but early repair with careful anticoagulation management is currently recommended. Recently, the author reported a successful case using a two-staged approach-reducing herniated organs and creating a silo before ECMO, followed by defect closure after ECMO decannulation-which suggests a potential alternative strategy for managing severe CDH. SUMMARY: A two-staged approach may offer a solution for severe CDH patients requiring ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.