Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457186›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Differential Neural Mechanisms of Feedback Processing in Children with Developmental Language Disorder: An Examination of Midfrontal Theta Connectivity.

Asiya Gul, Annika L Schafer, Yael Arbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asiya GulDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-598X
Annika L SchaferDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Yael ArbelDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA.

Funding

Examining the impaired learning mechanism in children with developmental language disorderR01DC018295 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI ARBEL, YAEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Optimizing feedback-based learning in children with developmentallanguage disorder.R01DC020735 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI Yael Arbel · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018295NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020735NIH NIDCD R01DC018295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPrevious research indicates that children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) face challenges learning from feedback, resulting in suboptimal performance and learning outcomes. Feedback processing, a key developing executive function, involves cognitive processes critical for goal-directed behavior. This study examined the neural mechanisms underlying feedback processing in school-age children with DLD compared to typically developing (TD) peers, focusing on midfrontal theta band (4-8 Hz) oscillations as an index of cognitive control and error monitoring.

methodsWe measured midfrontal theta inter-trial coherence (ITC) and inter-site coherence (ISC) at midfrontal (FCz), lateral prefrontal (F3/F4), and lateral central (C3/C4) sites in children with and without DLD (

resultsChildren with and without DLD showed elevated midfrontal theta oscillations in response to negative feedback that was followed by successful behavioral adjustments in the FRN time window. Activation in the P3a time window was only found in the TD group. Group differences were also noted in the inter-site coherence (ISC) associated with the effective processing of negative feedback. While in the TD group, effective processing of negative feedback was linked to high connectivity between midfrontal and right sensorimotor regions, in the DLD group, effective processing of negative feedback was associated with high connectivity between midfrontal and left sensorimotor sites.

conclusionsDifferential ISC patterns in children with DLD may indicate that they employ alternative or compensatory neural strategies, possibly due to atypical right sensorimotor engagement.

Indexed as

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD)feedback processinginter-site coherencemidfrontal thetaWisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)

Identifiers

PMID39457186
PMCPMC11505951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.