Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39457180›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Usability Evaluation of the Revised

Lauri Linder, Haley Utendorfer, Brianna Oliveros, Sydney Gilliland, Victoria L Tiase, Roger Altizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauri LinderCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-4164
Haley UtendorferSchool of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84113, USA.
Brianna OliverosCollege of Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3253-9075
Sydney GillilandMedstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Victoria L TiaseCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5653-2282
Roger AltizerDepartment of Population Health Science, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

Funding

St. Baldrick's Foundation Supportive Care GrantUniversity of Utah Office of Undergraduate Research Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe

methodsGuided by the Technology Acceptance Model and principles of user-centered design, this study supported refinements to the

resultsFourteen children (median age 8.5 years; range 6-12) and 14 parents (median age 38.5 years; range 34-49) participated in one of three usability evaluation cycles. After the third cycle, children and parents navigated the app and completed key tasks independently. Median TAM-PUS scores were 6 (range 6-8), indicating high perceived usefulness. Qualitative analyses indicated that children regarded the app as easy and fun to use. Parents emphasized the app's developmental relevance for their child and for themselves as the child's caregiver.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the revised

Indexed as

childhood cancerdigital healthmHealthparentssymptom assessmentsymptomsusability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39457180
PMCPMC11506821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.