ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Cancer Vaccines: Recent Insights and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer and tumor vaccines (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Recent advances in lipid nanoparticles for cancer vaccine delivery: Challenges and future perspectives.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Bacterial extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer: mechanisms, biomarker potential, and therapeutic engineering.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Activation of endogenous retroviruses in tumor cells and their immunomodulatory mechanisms: from molecular basis to clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and machine learning as an accurate and rapid diagnostic tool for hydrocephalus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The long-lasting expression of recombinant artLCMV following intraperitoneal administration exerts potent antitumor effects on tumor models of peritoneal carcinomatosis.Oncoimmunology · 2025Article
- Therapeutic anti-cancer vaccines: a systematic review of prospective intervention trials for common hematological malignancies.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Development and challenges in the treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Strategies for neoantigen screening and immunogenicity validation in cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Cancer Vaccines and Beyond: The Transformative Role of Nanotechnology in Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Advances in Tumor Antigen Vaccines: A New Frontier in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells 2.0: thinking outside the box.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of cancer immunotherapy has seen incredible advancements in the past decades. mRNA-based cancer vaccines generating de novo T cell responses, particularly against tumor-specific antigens (TSAs), have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes and overcome diverse challenges. Despite the high potential of neoantigens to provide personalized immunotherapies through their tumor specificity and immunogenicity, challenges related to the scarcity of immunogenic neoepitopes have prompted continuous research towards finding new tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and broader therapeutic frameworks, which may now learn from the genuine successes obtained with neoantigens. As an example, human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) have emerged as potential alternatives to tumor neoantigens due to their high tumoral expression and ability to elicit both T cell reactivity and B cell responses associated with the efficacy of existing immunotherapies. This review aims to assess the status and limitations of TSA-directed mRNA cancer vaccines and the lessons that can be derived from these and checkpoint inhibitor studies to guide TAA vaccine development. We expect that shared B cell, CD4 and CD8 T cell antigen presentation will be key to stimulate continuous T cell expansion and efficacy for tumors that do not contain pre-existing tertiary lymphoid structures. When these structures are present in highly mutated tumors, the current checkpoint-based immunotherapies show efficacy even in immune privileged sites, and vaccines may hold the key to broaden efficacy to more tumor types and stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.