ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Differential Effects of Four Canonical Notch-Activating Ligands on c-Kit+ Cardiac Progenitor Cells.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Notch signaling, an important signaling pathway in cardiac development, has been shown to mediate the reparative functions of c-kit+ progenitor cells (CPCs). However, it is unclear how each of the four canonical Notch-activating ligands affects intracellular processes in c-kit+ cells when used as an external stimulus. Neonatal c-kit+ CPCs were stimulated using four different chimeric Notch-activating ligands tethered to Dynabeads, and the resulting changes were assessed using TaqMan gene expression arrays, with subsequent analysis by principal component analysis (PCA). Additionally, functional outcomes were measured using an endothelial cell tube formation assay and MSC migration assay to assess the paracrine capacity to stimulate new vessel formation and recruit other reparative cell types to the site of injury. Gene expression data showed that stimulation with Jagged-1 is associated with the greatest pro-angiogenic gene response, including the expression of VEGF and basement membrane proteins, while the other canonical ligands, Jagged-2, Dll-1, and Dll-4, are more associated with regulatory and epigenetic changes. The functional assay showed differential responses to the four ligands in terms of angiogenesis, while none of the ligands produced a robust change in migration. These data demonstrate how the four Notch-activating ligands differentially regulate CPC gene expression and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.