ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Unravelling Different Water Management Strategies in Three Olive Cultivars: The Role of Osmoprotectants, Proteins, and Wood Properties.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the responses of olive trees to drought stress is crucial for improving cultivation and developing drought-tolerant varieties. Water transport and storage within the plant is a key factor in drought-tolerance strategies. Water management can be based on a variety of factors such as stomatal control, osmoprotectant molecules, proteins and wood properties. The aim of the study was to evaluate the water management strategy under drought stress from an anatomical and biochemical point of view in three young Italian olive cultivars (Giarraffa, Leccino and Maurino) previously distinguished for their physiological and metabolomic responses. For each cultivar, 15 individuals in pots were exposed or not to 28 days of water withholding. Every 7 days, the content of sugars (including mannitol), proline, aquaporins, osmotins, and dehydrins, in leaves and stems, as well as the chemical and anatomical characteristics of the wood of the three cultivars, were analyzed. 'Giarraffa' reduced glucose levels and increased mannitol production, while 'Leccino' accumulated more proline. Both 'Leccino' and 'Maurino' increased sucrose and aquaporin levels, possibly due to their ability to remove embolisms. 'Maurino' and 'Leccino' accumulated more dehydrins and osmotins. While neither genotype nor stress affected wood chemistry, 'Maurino' had a higher vessel-to-xylem area ratio and a larger hydraulic diameter, which allows it to maintain a high transpiration rate but may make it more susceptible to cavitation. The results emphasized the need for an integrated approach, highlighting the importance of the relative timing and sequence of each parameter analyzed, allowing, overall, to define a "strategy" rather than a "response" to drought of each cultivar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.