Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39456839›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Unravelling Different Water Management Strategies in Three Olive Cultivars: The Role of Osmoprotectants, Proteins, and Wood Properties.

Sara Parri, Claudia Faleri, Marco Romi, José C Del Río, Jorge Rencoret, Maria Celeste Pereira Dias, Sara Anichini, Claudio Cantini, Giampiero Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara ParriDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9074
Claudia FaleriDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Marco RomiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena, Italy.
José C Del RíoInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, CSIC, Reina Mercedes 10, E-41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3040-6787
Jorge RencoretInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, CSIC, Reina Mercedes 10, E-41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2728-7331
Maria Celeste Pereira DiasCentre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3083-6218
Sara AnichiniDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Claudio CantiniInstitute for BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Strada Provinciale Aurelia Vecchia 49, 58022 Follonica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-6013
Giampiero CaiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-3557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the responses of olive trees to drought stress is crucial for improving cultivation and developing drought-tolerant varieties. Water transport and storage within the plant is a key factor in drought-tolerance strategies. Water management can be based on a variety of factors such as stomatal control, osmoprotectant molecules, proteins and wood properties. The aim of the study was to evaluate the water management strategy under drought stress from an anatomical and biochemical point of view in three young Italian olive cultivars (Giarraffa, Leccino and Maurino) previously distinguished for their physiological and metabolomic responses. For each cultivar, 15 individuals in pots were exposed or not to 28 days of water withholding. Every 7 days, the content of sugars (including mannitol), proline, aquaporins, osmotins, and dehydrins, in leaves and stems, as well as the chemical and anatomical characteristics of the wood of the three cultivars, were analyzed. 'Giarraffa' reduced glucose levels and increased mannitol production, while 'Leccino' accumulated more proline. Both 'Leccino' and 'Maurino' increased sucrose and aquaporin levels, possibly due to their ability to remove embolisms. 'Maurino' and 'Leccino' accumulated more dehydrins and osmotins. While neither genotype nor stress affected wood chemistry, 'Maurino' had a higher vessel-to-xylem area ratio and a larger hydraulic diameter, which allows it to maintain a high transpiration rate but may make it more susceptible to cavitation. The results emphasized the need for an integrated approach, highlighting the importance of the relative timing and sequence of each parameter analyzed, allowing, overall, to define a "strategy" rather than a "response" to drought of each cultivar.

Indexed as

OleaPlant ProteinsWaterWoodAquaporinsDroughtsMannitolPlant LeavesProlineStress, PhysiologicalAquaporinsMannitolPlant ProteinsProlineWater2D-NMR spectroscopyaquaporinsdehydrinsligninOlea europaeaosmoprotectantsosmotinsugarsWestern blottingwood anatomy

Identifiers

PMID39456839
PMCPMC11507519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.