ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
ddPCR Overcomes the CRISPR-Cas13a-Based Technique for the Detection of the BRAF p.V600E Mutation in Liquid Biopsies.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Modern treatment of craniopharyngioma to improve outcomes: evidence of a change of paradigm.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements in CRISPR/Cas Technologies for Sensitive Cancer Detection: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Clinical Translation Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- A Modular and Programmable Cas13d Platform for RNA Single Nucleotide Variant Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Current Biomarkers, Emerging Technologies, and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- CIRCLE-F/V: a dual-mode CRISPR-Cas13a cascade biosensor for ultrasensitive and visual detection of low-abundance EGFR mutations.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- FAME-CRISPR improves CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing via HDAC inhibition and engineered virus-like particle delivery.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy - a narrative review with an update on current US governmental clinical trials targeting immunotherapy.Future science OA · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas-Based Diagnostics in Biomedicine: Principles, Applications, and Future Trajectories.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The isolation of circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) present in the bloodstream brings about the opportunity to detect genomic aberrations from the tumor of origin. However, the low amounts of ctDNA present in liquid biopsy samples makes the development of highly sensitive techniques necessary to detect targetable mutations for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of cancer patients. Here, we employ standard genomic DNA (gDNA) and eight liquid biopsy samples from different cancer patients to examine the newly described CRISPR-Cas13a-based technology in the detection of the BRAF p.V600E actionable point mutation and appraise its diagnostic capacity with two PCR-based techniques: quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Regardless of its lower specificity compared to the qPCR and ddPCR techniques, the CRISPR-Cas13a-guided complex was able to detect inputs as low as 10 pM. Even though the PCR-based techniques have similar target limits of detection (LoDs), only the ddPCR achieved a 0.1% variant allele frequency (VAF) detection with elevated reproducibility, thus standing out as the most powerful and suitable tool for clinical diagnosis purposes. Our results also demonstrate how the CRISPR-Cas13a can detect low amounts of the target of interest, but its base-pair specificity failed in the detection of actionable point mutations at a low VAF; therefore, the ddPCR is still the most powerful and suitable technique for these purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.