Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39456686›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

ddPCR Overcomes the CRISPR-Cas13a-Based Technique for the Detection of the BRAF p.V600E Mutation in Liquid Biopsies.

Irina Palacín-Aliana, Noemí García-Romero, Josefa Carrión-Navarro, Pilar Puig-Serra, Raul Torres-Ruiz, Sandra Rodríguez-Perales, David Viñal, Víctor González-Rumayor, Ángel Ayuso-Sacido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A Modular and Programmable Cas13d Platform for RNA Single Nucleotide Variant Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Irina Palacín-AlianaAtrys Health, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1420-9940
Noemí García-RomeroFaculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-8848
Josefa Carrión-NavarroFaculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-1240
Pilar Puig-SerraHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-4972
Raul Torres-RuizHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9606-0398
Sandra Rodríguez-PeralesHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-3636
David ViñalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Víctor González-RumayorAtrys Health, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Ángel Ayuso-SacidoFaculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer AECC Lab 2020, LABAE20049RODRComunidad de Madrid IND2019/BMD-17222Instituto de Salud Carlos III and FEDER PI20/01837Instituto de Salud Carlos III and FEDER PI21/01353Instituto de Salud Carlos III and FEDER PI21/01641Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad-FEDER RTC-2019-6918-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isolation of circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) present in the bloodstream brings about the opportunity to detect genomic aberrations from the tumor of origin. However, the low amounts of ctDNA present in liquid biopsy samples makes the development of highly sensitive techniques necessary to detect targetable mutations for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of cancer patients. Here, we employ standard genomic DNA (gDNA) and eight liquid biopsy samples from different cancer patients to examine the newly described CRISPR-Cas13a-based technology in the detection of the BRAF p.V600E actionable point mutation and appraise its diagnostic capacity with two PCR-based techniques: quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Regardless of its lower specificity compared to the qPCR and ddPCR techniques, the CRISPR-Cas13a-guided complex was able to detect inputs as low as 10 pM. Even though the PCR-based techniques have similar target limits of detection (LoDs), only the ddPCR achieved a 0.1% variant allele frequency (VAF) detection with elevated reproducibility, thus standing out as the most powerful and suitable tool for clinical diagnosis purposes. Our results also demonstrate how the CRISPR-Cas13a can detect low amounts of the target of interest, but its base-pair specificity failed in the detection of actionable point mutations at a low VAF; therefore, the ddPCR is still the most powerful and suitable technique for these purposes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationNeoplasmsPoint MutationPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsBRAF protein, humanCirculating Tumor DNAProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafactionable mutationsBRAF p.V600ECRISPR-Cas13addPCRqPCRvariant allele frequency

Identifiers

PMID39456686
PMCPMC11507125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.