ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Antibiofilm and Antimicrobial Potentials of Novel Synthesized Sulfur Camphor Derivatives.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Biologically Active Complexes with Camphor-Derived Ligands to Biologically Active Biomaterials.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biodesulfurization and activation of a thionated levofloxacin derivative: antimicrobial evaluation and LC-MS-based metabolic profiling.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Biological activities (antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-coronavirus (229E)) and chemical composition of some essential oils.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Activity of Hydroethanolic Extracts ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phytochemicals and Antibacterial Activity of Leaf and Twig of Three Fabaceae Species.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Organosulfur compounds as dual-action agents: a critical review of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory potentials, and translational barriers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The question being posed by scientists around the world is how different chemical modifications of naturally occurring compounds will affect their antimicrobial properties. In the current study, sulfur derivatives of camphor containing a sulfur atom were tested to detect their antimicrobial and antibiofilm potentials. The new compounds were tested on eight Gram-positive strains (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.