ArticleCancers2024
Dysbiosis of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract in Head-and-Neck Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study Using the Capsule Sponge Device.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA non-endoscopic capsule-sponge device allows sampling the entire length of the esophagus. Here, we compared microbiomes of the oral cavity, esophagus, and gastric corpus collected by oral swab, capsule-sponge device, and endoscopic biopsy, respectively, in patients representing three distinct risk profiles for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
methodsThe study enrolled 11 patients with esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, 21 patients after curative treatment for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) (HNSCC survivors), and 40 patients with functional dyspeptic (FD) symptoms. Microbial genomic DNA was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
resultsThe Shannon index of the capsule-sponge sample microbiota was significantly higher in FD group than in patients after treatment for HNSCC, and the Chao index of gastric samples differed between HNSCC survivors and FD patients. Analysis of the β-diversity of FD patients, HNSCC, and esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia showed that different genera formed at each location. The abundance of 205, 116, and 9 genera differed between FD patients and HNSCC survivors in the gastric, capsule-sponge, and oral samples, respectively; 33 genera differed between the FD group and patients with esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in capsule-sponge samples.
conclusionsThe bacterial communities of the upper digestive tract were clustered according to the anatomic site. Despite substantial differences in gastric and esophageal microbiota samples between FD patients and HNSCC survivors, the microbial members and diversity showed small differences between FD patients and those with esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia. It remains unclear whether gastric and esophageal dysbiosis is associated with or is a consequence of treatment for HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.