Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39456332›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Navigating Food Fraud: A Survey of Nigerian Consumer Knowledge and Attitudes.

Helen Onyeaka, Amarachukwu Anyogu, Olumide A Odeyemi, Michael Ukwuru Ukwuru, Ukpai Eze, Folayemi J Isaac-Bamgboye, Christian K Anumudu, Oluwabunmi O Akinwunmi, Olufemi Peter Sotayo, Yemisi A Jeff-Agboola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Helen OnyeakaSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-847X
Amarachukwu AnyoguSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK.
Olumide A OdeyemiOffice of Research Services, Research Division, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7248, Australia.
Michael Ukwuru UkwuruDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Federal Polytechnic Idah, Idah 27110, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-1929
Ukpai EzeChester Medical School, University of Chester, Chester CH2 1BR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-4714
Folayemi J Isaac-BamgboyeDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology Akure, Akure 340110, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-9341
Christian K AnumuduSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-0178
Oluwabunmi O AkinwunmiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bowen University, Iwo 232102, Nigeria.
Olufemi Peter SotayoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos 101017, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-8335
Yemisi A Jeff-AgboolaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City 351103, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fraud presents a growing threat globally, impacting consumer health; food safety; and brand credibility. The key motivation for food fraud is usually an economic or financial advantage. Economically motivated food fraud (EMA) is the illegal deception, deliberate and intentional substitution or addition of a substance in a food product, which may pose a possible health risk to unsuspecting consumers. This study aims to assess the awareness and attitudes of Nigerian consumers towards food authenticity and the regulatory measures in place to combat food adulteration. The study comprised 2160 respondents who were asked about their knowledge of high-profile food fraud incidents, frequently adulterated products, and their opinions of the effects of food fraud and preventative measures. The findings of this study revealed that more than a third of respondents were unfamiliar with the term "food fraud". However, they were aware of local high-profile cases, such as "plastic rice" and counterfeit dairy products. Most participants relied on point-of-sale information for assessing food authenticity, with street vendors being viewed as potential sources of food adulteration. The study also found that more than half of the respondents were concerned about food fraud regardless of whether it involved local or imported products. A wide variety of food items were identified as prone to adulteration or fraudulent activity. These included alcoholic drinks, dairy products, honey, rice, and tomato paste, amongst others. These findings highlight the need for improved consumer awareness, regulatory effectiveness, and remediation efforts to combat food fraud in Nigeria.

Indexed as

consumer perceptioneconomically motivated adulterationfood fraudfood safetyNigeria

Identifiers

PMID39456332
PMCPMC11508003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.