ArticleBiomolecules2024
Pulling Forces Differentially Affect Refolding Pathways Due to Entangled Misfolded States in SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain.
Article in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) experiments can monitor protein refolding by applying a small force of a few piconewtons (pN) and slowing down the folding process. Bell theory predicts that in the narrow force regime where refolding can occur, the folding time should increase exponentially with increased external force. In this work, using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, we compared the refolding pathways of SARS-CoV-1 RBD and SARS-CoV-2 RBD (RBD refers to the receptor binding domain) starting from unfolded conformations with and without a force applied to the protein termini. For SARS-CoV-2 RBD, the number of trajectories that fold is significantly reduced with the application of a 5 pN force, indicating that, qualitatively consistent with Bell theory, refolding is slowed down when a pulling force is applied to the termini. In contrast, the refolding times of SARS-CoV-1 RBD do not change meaningfully when a force of 5 pN is applied. How this lack of a Bell response could arise at the molecular level is unknown. Analysis of the entanglement changes of the folded conformations revealed that in the case of SARS-CoV-1 RBD, an external force minimizes misfolding into kinetically trapped states, thereby promoting efficient folding and offsetting any potential slowdown due to the external force. These misfolded states contain non-native entanglements that do not exist in the native state of either SARS-CoV-1-RBD or SARS-CoV-2-RBD. These results indicate that non-Bell behavior can arise from this class of misfolding and, hence, may be a means of experimentally detecting these elusive, theoretically predicted states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.