ReviewBiomolecules2024
Is There a Role for Immunostimulant Bacterial Lysates in the Management of Respiratory Tract Infection?
Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial-Derived Immunomodulators as a Preventive Strategy for Viral Respiratory Tract Infections and Associated Wheezing or Asthma in Children: A Targeted Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Postbiotics: Modulation of the Gut Microbiota and Potential for Association with Nanotechnology.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Article
- Development of a Bacterial Lysate from Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens Causing Hospital Infections.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial Lysates are immunostimulants clinically prescribed for the prevention of respiratory tract infections (RTIs). It has been shown that Bacterial Lysates upregulate the immune system, acting both on innate and adaptive reactions. In fact, there are demonstrations of their efficacy in restoring the integrity and immune function of epithelial barriers, activating ILC3 and dendritic cells with an enhanced Th1 response, and producing serum IgG and serum and salivary IgA specific to the administered bacterial antigens. The activated immune system also protects against other bacteria and viruses due to a trained immunity effect. Most studies show that the number of RTIs and their severity decrease in Bacterial Lysates-pretreated patients, without relevant side effects. The Bacterial Lysates treatment, in addition to reducing the number of RTIs, also prevents the deterioration of the underlying disease (i.e., COPD) induced by repeated infections. Despite these positive data, the most recent meta-analyses evidence the weakness of the studies performed, which are of low quality and have an inadequate number of patients, some of which were non-randomized while others were without a control group or were performed contemporarily in different clinical conditions or with different ages. The high heterogeneity of the studies does not allow us to state Bacterial Lysates' effectiveness in preventing RTIs with sufficient certainty. To completely define their indications, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trials should be performed for each product and for each indication. The study population should be adequate for each indication. For this purpose, an adequate run-in phase will be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.