ReviewBiomolecules2024
Advances and Challenges in Scoring Functions for RNA-Protein Complex Structure Prediction.
Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimentally Tuned Protein-RNA Rosetta Score Function using Bayesian Optimization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Probabilistic computing utilizing HfONature communications · 2026Article
- Inferring the qualities of protein-RNA models with graph transformers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- gCoSRNA: Generalizable Coaxial Stacking Prediction for RNA Junctions Using Secondary Structure.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Overcoming translational barriers in RNA-protein docking: enhancing computational accuracy for targeted drug discovery.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Advances and Mechanisms of RNA-Ligand Interaction Predictions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing interface accuracy in macromolecular complexes.PloS one · 2025Article
- Proteins Combined Score Prediction Based on Improved Gene Expression Programming Algorithm and Protein-Protein Interaction Network Characterization.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-protein complexes play a crucial role in cellular functions, providing insights into cellular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, experimental determination of these complex structures is often time-consuming and resource-intensive, and it rarely yields high-resolution data. Many computational approaches have been developed to predict RNA-protein complex structures in recent years. Despite these advances, achieving accurate and high-resolution predictions remains a formidable challenge, primarily due to the limitations inherent in current RNA-protein scoring functions. These scoring functions are critical tools for evaluating and interpreting RNA-protein interactions. This review comprehensively explores the latest advancements in scoring functions for RNA-protein docking, delving into the fundamental principles underlying various approaches, including coarse-grained knowledge-based, all-atom knowledge-based, and machine-learning-based methods. We critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing scoring functions, providing a detailed performance assessment. Considering the significant progress demonstrated by machine learning techniques, we discuss emerging trends and propose future research directions to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of scoring functions in RNA-protein complex prediction. We aim to inspire the development of more sophisticated and reliable computational tools in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.