Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39456110›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Ultrasound-guided intra-tumoral administration of directly-injected therapies: a review of the technical and logistical considerations.

George Gabriel Bitar, Melissa Persad, Alina Dragan, Adebayo Alade, Pablo Jiménez-Labaig, Edward Johnston, Samuel J Withey, Nicos Fotiadis, Kevin J Harrington, Derfel Ap Dafydd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

George Gabriel BitarThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Melissa PersadSt George's NHS foundation trust, London, UK.
Alina DraganThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Adebayo AladeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Pablo Jiménez-LabaigThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Edward JohnstonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Samuel J WitheyThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Nicos FotiadisThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.
Derfel Ap DafyddThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK. derfel.apdafydd@rmh.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirectly-injected therapies (DIT) include a broad range of agents within a developing research field in cancer immunotherapy, with encouraging clinical trial results in various tumour subtypes. Currently, the majority of such therapies are only available within clinical trials; however, more recently, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC, Imlygic) has been approved as the first oncolytic virus therapy in the USA and Europe. Our institution contributes to multiple different trials exploring the efficacy of DIT, the majority of which are performed by oncologists in clinic. However, specific, challenging cases - mainly neck tumours - require image-guided administration. MAIN BODY: This review article addresses the technical and logistical factors relevant to the incorporation of image-guided DIT into an established ultrasound service. Image-guidance (usually with ultrasound) is frequently needed for certain targets that cannot be palpated or are in high-risk locations, e.g. adjacent to blood vessels. A multi-disciplinary approach is essential to facilitate a safe and efficient service, including careful case-selection. Certain protocols and guidance need to be followed when incorporating such a service into an established ultrasound practice to enhance efficiency and optimise safety. Key learning points are drawn from the literature and from our early experience at a tertiary cancer centre following image guided DIT for an initial cohort of 22 patients (including 11 with a neck mass), addressing trial protocols, pre-procedure work-up, organisation, planning, consent, technical aspects, procedure tolerability, technical success, and post-procedure considerations.

conclusionWith appropriate planning and coordination, and application of the learning points discussed herein, image-guided administration of DIT can be safely and efficiently incorporated into an established procedural ultrasound list. This has relevance to cancer centres, radiology departments, individual radiologists, and other team members with a future role in meeting the emerging need for these procedures. This paper provides advice on developing such an imaging service, and offers certain insights into the evolving remit of radiologists within cancer care in the near future.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, InterventionalHumansInjections, IntralesionalNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyCTDirectly-injected therapiesHead and neckOncologyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39456110
PMCPMC11515368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.