ArticleBMC medical genomics2024
RNA-seq validation of microRNA expression signatures for precision melanoma diagnosis and prognostic stratification.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetics of Malignant Melanoma: Mechanisms, Diagnostic Approaches and Therapeutic Applications.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles From a Model of Melanoma Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Induce Changes in Brain Microvascular Cells Consistent With Pre-Metastatic Niche Priming.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Circulating MicroRNAs: functional biomarkers for melanoma prognosis and treatment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew diagnostic tools are needed to improve the diagnosis and risk stratification of cutaneous melanoma. Disease-specific microRNA signatures have been previously described via NanoString profiling of solid biopsy tissue and plasma. This study validated these signatures via next-generation sequencing technology and compared their performance against clinical metrics and other published melanoma signatures.
methodsRNA from 64 plasma and 60 FFPE biopsy samples from individuals with invasive melanoma or related benign/control phenotypes was extracted and enriched for microRNA. RNA sequencing was performed to compute MEL38/MEL12 signature scores. The results were evaluated with published NanoString and RNA sequencing datasets, comprising 548 solid tissue samples and 217 plasma samples, to predict disease status and patient outcome.
resultsThe MEL38 diagnostic signature classifies patients into discrete diagnostic groups via RNA sequencing in either solid tissue or plasma (P < 0.001). In solid tissue, the prognostic MEL12 signature stratifies patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, independent of clinical covariates. The hazard ratios for 10-year overall survival, based on observed survival intervals, were 2.2 (MEL12 high-risk vs low-risk, P < 0.001) and 1.8 (intermediate-risk vs low-risk, P < 0.001), outperforming other published prognostic models. MEL12 also exhibited prognostic significance in the plasma of 42 patients with invasive disease.
conclusionsThe MEL38 and MEL12 signatures can be assessed in either solid tissue or plasma using RNA-seq and are strong predictors of disease state and patient outcome. Compared with other genomic methods, MEL12 was shown to be the strongest predictor of poor prognosis. MicroRNA expression profiling offers objective, accurate genomic information about a patient's likelihood of invasive melanoma and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.