ArticleBMC medical education2024
From books to the bedside: post-graduation impact of 'Week On the Wards' on medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transition between preclinical and clinical years during medical school has been shown to be challenging. Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (CMSRU) implements one required two-week-long shadowing program for first and one one-week-long shadowing program for second-year medical students called Week On the Wards (WOW). The goal of this study is to ascertain whether students who completed the WOW curriculum found it beneficial over the long-term. Specifically, we want to evaluate alumni's impression of the program's influence on career, specialty choice, professional development, personal development, and confidence.
methodsTo evaluate our program, we developed, validated, and distributed a survey via email in the autumn of 2023. Our population included alumni from the classes of 2019-2022, irrespective of race and gender. After following steps for survey development, it was validated via focus group using qualitative methods. The survey consisted of 19 questions answerable on a 5-point Likert scale, a "Yes/No/Unsure/Maybe" section, and an optional open-ended response question. Descriptive analysis was done to report the percent responses.
resultsThe survey was emailed to 353 alumni, with 72 completed responses returned. Majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the WOW program showcased the importance of teamwork in medicine (80.6%), helped them learn to apply medical knowledge (77.8%), influenced their decision regarding which residency/specialty they chose (72.2%), provided an example of how teamwork in medicine is necessary for patient safety and effective care (66.6%), and increased their confidence in their networking skills (66.6%). Alumni nearly unanimously agreed that the WOW program was a useful part of their medical school education (93.1%) and that it should be continued for future classes (94.4%).
conclusionOur results highlight the sustained importance of early preclinical exposure to clinical environments in students' future career decisions, in their understanding of the clinical applications of learned preclinical topics, and the importance of teamwork in medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.