Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39456020›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

The value of a multimodal approach combining radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy in the recurrence treatment of gynecological malignancies - analysis of a large patient cohort in a tertiary care center.

Tanja Sprave, Raluca Stoian, Natalia Volegova-Neher, Mark Gainey, Michael Kollefrath, Dimos Baltas, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Rieke Schröder, Florin-Andrei Taran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tanja Sprave *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. tanja.sprave@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Raluca Stoian *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Natalia Volegova-NeherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Mark GaineyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Michael KollefrathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Dimos BaltasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anca-Ligia GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Ingolf Juhasz-BössDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rieke Schröder *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Florin-Andrei Taran *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies have a poor prognosis. In particularly, pelvic local recurrence after previous radiotherapy and/or positive resection margins during surgical treatment for recurrent disease result in low survival rates. Consequently, locoregional control is of utmost importance in this cohort of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes and determine prognostic factors for patients treated with surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies.

methods40 patients who underwent surgical treatment and IORT between 2010 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion. The median follow-up time was 22 months. The outcomes measured were locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and survival without distant metastases (DMFS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of patient variables and treatment factors on the endpoints mentioned. The following variables were analyzed: age at surgical treatment and IORT and initial diagnosis (< 65 vs. ≥65 years, each), disease-free interval (DFI) between initial diagnosis and first recurrence, DFI to surgical treatment and IORT, grading, histology, IORT dose (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) and technique (high dose radiotherapy (HDR) vs. IORT using electrons, (IOERT)). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsThe mean IORT dose was 13.8 Gy (range 10-18 Gy). Cervical carcinoma was most frequently found in 27.5% of patients followed by endometrial carcinoma and vulvar carcinoma in 25% respectively. The final histopathologic results after surgery with IORT showed no residual tumour in 24 patients (60%), microscopic residual disease in 5 patients (12.5%), resection status could not be evaluated in three patients (7.5%) and the resection status was unknown in eight patients (20%). Subsequently, 27.5% of patients also received adjuvant radiotherapy of the local recurrence bed. However, after IORT, 65% of the women suffered a recurrence. Of these, the recurrences were localized: in-field 32.5%, out-of-field 22.5% and margin-of-field 12.5%. The 3- and 5-year OS was 69% and 55% respectively. The 3- and 5-year LRC was 56% respectively. The 3- and 5-year DMFS was 66% and 49%. Whereas the comparison between groups by IORT dose level (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) showed a non-significant trend in favor of the higher dose only for OS (p = 0.094), but not in LRC and DMFS (p > 0.05). OS and DMFS, but not LRC, differed significantly between the HDR-IORT and IOERT groups (p = 0.06 and p = 0.03,) in favor of the HDR-IORT technique. For HDR-IORT technique a trend towards superior OS and LRC was observed in the univariate analysis: HR 3.76, CI 95%: 0.95-14.881, p = 0.059 and HR 2.165 CI 95%: 0.916-5.114, p = 0.078

conclusionsThe survival rate for pelvic recurrence in gynecological malignancies remains poor and comparable with historical data from the last two decades. Particularly HDR-IORT, appears to provide a long-term oncological benefit in carefully selected patients.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateElectronGynecological cancerHigh-dose-radiotherapyIntraoperative radiotherapyRadiation therapyRadical surgeryRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39456020
PMCPMC11515090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.