ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Comparison of a novel side-to-side tenorrhaphy with Pulvertaft weave: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suture techniques in the surgical management of flexor tendon, Achilles tendon and cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Ex vivo mechanical testing of double strand, braided and knitted polyethylene suture for acute transverse section of the Achilles tendon in a dog model.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to characterize the biomechanical properties of a novel side-to-side tenorrhaphy (SST), this tenorrhaphy is designed to achieve reliable strength utilizing fewer knots and greater operationalization. This is compared with a well-established tendon reconstruction technique called the Pulvertaft weave technique (PWT).
methodsTwenty fresh porcine hindfoot flexor tendons were collected, and 10 novel SST and 10 PWT were performed in each group. The repaired tendons were tested cyclically by applying a force of 35 N using an electric tensile testing machine. Tendons were loaded until they ruptured and failed. The cyclic elongation, ultimate elongation, ultimate failure load, stiffness, and operation time were recorded and analyzed for both groups, and the failure patterns of the tendons were observed.
resultsThe mean operation time were 1.86 in the SST group and 3.25 min for the PWT group, respectively. The ultimate failure load was 179.93 N ± 12.05 for the SST group and 113.46 N ± 7.89 for the PWT group. The ultimate elongation was 17.79 mm ± 0.51 for the SST group and 26.83 mm ± 0.64 for the PWT group. The stiffness of the SST group was 35.27 N/mm ± 0.90 in the SST group and 20.11 N/mm ± 0.84 in the PWT group. There was no statistically significant difference in cyclic elongation.
conclusionThe SST group performed better than the PWT group in terms of the ultimate elongation, ultimate failure load, and stiffness. It is clear that the novel SST is a reliable alternative to PWT for tendon repair. The operation time of the SST group was significantly shorter than that of the PWT group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.