ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Comprehensive classification and its value of capitellar cartilage injury concomitant with radial head fracture.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concomitant capitellum fractures in patients with radial head fractures: incidence, risk factors and primary outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value.
methodsAccording to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb.
resultsMason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11-26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). According to the MEPI and HSS scores, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 100%.
conclusionDifferent types of CCI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. Surgical strategy according to the comprehensive CCI classification introduced in this paper may lead to a satisfactory outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.