ArticleBMC cancer2024
Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automatic segmentation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy in breast-conserving patients and exploration of clinical factors influential to its performance.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy without surgical clip implantation, the accuracy of tumor bed identification and the consistency of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation under computed tomography (CT) simulation remain suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) simulation on delineations by assessing interobserver variability (IOV).
methodsPreoperative MR and postoperative CT simulations were performed in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with no surgical clips implanted. Custom immobilization pads were used to ensure the same supine position. Three radiation oncologists independently delineated the CTV of tumor bed on the images acquired from MR and CT simulation registration and CT simulation alone. Cavity visualization score (CVS) was assigned to each patient based on the clarity of the tumor bed on CT simulation images. IOV was indicated by generalized conformity index (CI
resultsA total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of maximum pathological diameter of the tumors in all patients were 1.55 (0.80-1.92) cm. No statistical significance was found between the volumes of CTVs on CT simulation and on MR/CT simulation registration images (p = 0.387). CI
conclusionsFor patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery without surgical clip implantation, the use of preoperative MR simulation in delineating the CTV of tumor bed decreased the IOV among observers. The consistency of tumor bed identification was improved especially in cases where the margins of tumor bed were challenging to visualize on CT simulation images. The study findings offer potential benefits in reducing local recurrence and minimizing tissue irritation in the surrounding areas. Future investigation in a larger patient cohort to validate our results is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.