ArticleBMC nursing2024
The effect of nurse health literacy interventions on patient health literacy scores in specialty consultations: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teach back educational strategy on knowledge about breast cancer among low health literate women.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Factors Associated With Nurses' Self-Reported Susceptibility to Online Health Misinformation: Evidence From Greece.International nursing review · 2026Observational
- Exploration of the relationships between health literacy and experience of care integration in parents of children with special healthcare needs: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A health literacy intervention for registered nurses: Development and feasibility testing.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Exploring Health Literacy Heterogeneity in Prehypertension: Tailored Intervention Strategies Based on Latent Profile Analysis.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient health literacy (HL) affects health and wellbeing on both individual and population levels. The ability to receive, understand, manage and act upon health information can be positively influenced by nurses' use of HL strategies. This study examined the relationship between nurses' use of a HL checklist (intervention) and before and after patient HL scores, and the effects of frequency and types of strategies used in specialty consultations in Spain.
methodsThis quasi-experimental, non-randomized study used the HLS
resultsThe mean difference between the HLS
conclusionsThe use of a standardized HL intervention by nurses was shown to have a positive effect on patient general HL scores in specialty consultations in Spain. These results not only suggest that the use of a HL checklist can be an effective HL tool, but also reinforce the potential of nurses to make a positive impact on both individual and population health. Overall, these findings provide data that can be used by health systems, hospitals management, and nurse education programs to adopt strategies to improve patient HL and health outcomes, while potentially lowering costs and ineffective resource utilization related to inadequate HL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.