SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2024
Prophylactic corticosteroids for infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methylprednisolone for heart surgery in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Population pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone in neonates and paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProphylactic corticosteroids have been widely used to mitigate the inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the impact of this treatment on clinically important outcomes in infants remains uncertain.
methodsWe systematically searched databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Clinical Trials Registry, and Google Scholar from inception to March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which infants undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery received prophylactic corticosteroids or placebo were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. Considering clinical heterogeneity between studies, the random-effects model was used for analysis. Subgroup analyses on the neonatal studies and sensitivity analyses by the leave-one-out method were also conducted.
resultsEight RCTs comprising 1,920 patients were included. Our analysis suggested no significant difference in postoperative mortality (2.1% vs. 3.3%, risk ratio (RR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.41, 1.21]). Significantly increased insulin treatment in infants (19.0% vs. 6.5%, RR = 2.78, 95% CI [2.05, 3.77]) and significantly reduced duration of mechanical ventilation in neonates (mean difference = -22.28 h, 95% CI [-42.58, -1.97]) were observed in the corticosteroids group. There were no differences between groups for postoperative acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, low cardiac output syndrome, neurologic events, infection, or length of postoperative intensive care unit stay.
conclusionsCurrent evidence does not support the routine prophylactic use of corticosteroids in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Further large-scale research is needed to investigate the optimal agent, dosing regimen, and specific impact on various types of cardiac surgery.
trial registrationThis systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023400176).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.