Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455862›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Stemness in solid malignancies: coping with immune attack.

Judith Agudo, Yuxuan Miao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Metabolic-epigenetic reprogrammingActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. NSUN7-mediated mJournal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Judith Agudo *Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. judith_agudo@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-3169
Yuxuan Miao *Ben May Department of Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. miaoy@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1534-7993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has become a key new pillar of cancer treatment, and this has sparked interest in understanding mechanisms of cancer immune evasion. It has long been appreciated that cancers are constituted by heterogeneous populations of tumour cells. This feature is often fuelled by specialized cells that have molecular programs resembling tissue stem cells. Although these cancer stem cells (CSCs) have capacity for unlimited self-renewal and differentiation, it is increasingly evident that some CSCs are capable of achieving remarkable immune resistance. Given that most immunotherapy regiments have overlooked CSC-specific immune-evasive mechanisms, many current treatment strategies often lead to cancer relapse. This Review focuses on advancements in understanding how CSCs in solid tumours achieve their unique immune-evasive properties, enabling them to drive tumour regrowth. Moreover, as cancers often arise from tissue stem cells that acquired oncogenic mutations, we discuss how tissue stem cells undergoing malignant transformation activate intrinsic immune-evasive mechanisms and establish close interactions with suppressive immune cells to escape immune surveillance. In addition, we summarize how in advanced disease stages, CSCs often hijack features of normal stem cells to resist antitumour immunity. Finally, we provide insights in how to design a new generation of cancer immunotherapies to ensure elimination of CSCs.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsAnimalsHumansTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.