ArticleScientific reports2024
Safe subdural administration and retention of a neurotrophin-3-delivering hydrogel in a rat model of spinal cord injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Diversified Materials for Spinal Cord Injury Repair and Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current State of the Neurotrophin-Based Pharmaceutics in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Neuroinflammation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Neurotoxicological Evaluation of Intrathecal Citrate Excipients: Calcium Homeostasis Disruption and Safety Implications in CNS Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Multidimensional exploration of hydrogels as biological scaffolds for spinal cord regeneration: mechanisms and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurotrophic growth factor (GF) loaded hydrogels have shown promise as a treatment approach for spinal cord injury (SCI). However, SCI presents complex challenges for the direct administration of treatment due to the spinal cord's intricate anatomy and highly sensitive environment. Many current hydrogel administration approaches overlook this complexity, limiting their translational potential. To address this, we propose a novel intrathecal administration method using an in situ gelling, hyaluronic acid-modified heparin-poloxamer hydrogel loaded with neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) for the direct delivery of NT-3 to the spinal cord. We injected a NT-3 loaded hydrogel into the intrathecal space immediately after contusion SCI in Sprague Dawley (SpD) rats. Our results indicate that injecting the NT-3 loaded hydrogel into the intrathecal space was safe and that the gel was retained alongside the cord for at least one week. Additionally, no adverse effects were observed on rat behaviour. While functional improvement trends were noted, statistical significance was not reached, and immunohistochemistry results showed no significant difference between treatment groups. Overall, our findings suggest the feasibility, safety, and potential of the developed intrathecal administration technique for delivering diverse therapeutic molecules for SCI recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.