Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455773›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2024

Polishing systems for modern aesthetic dental materials: a narrative review.

Adil Khan, Nicholas Hodson, Asmaa Altaie

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adil KhanClinical Teaching Fellow in Restorative Dentistry, Level 6 Worsley Building, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK. A.Khan4@leeds.ac.uk.
Nicholas HodsonProfessor/Honorary Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Level 6 Worsley Building, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK.
Asmaa AltaieSenior Clinical Lecturer/Honorary Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Level 6 Worsley Building, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives To review the current literature surrounding chairside polishing systems for resin composites, zirconia and lithium disilicate restorations.Methods A literature search was undertaken and databases were hand-searched for the most relevant articles.Discussion The current marketplace contains a wide variety of polishing systems, each with different abrasive compounds and number of steps. Current efforts are aimed at reducing the number of steps required for polishing to improve clinical effectiveness. Reduced step systems showed some comparable results to the more traditional multi-step protocols, but the most effective results were achieved with the use of polishing paste as an additional step.Conclusions Based on the current available literature, the use of material-specific polishing systems is effective for chairside polishing of direct and indirect restorative materials. However, it is important to emphasise that, for optimum outcomes, it is essential to follow manufacturers' recommendations for each step, with particular considerations of the handpiece speed, time spent per step and use of adjunct water coolant.

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsDental PolishingEsthetics, DentalComposite ResinsDental PorcelainDental Restoration, PermanentHumansZirconiumComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental Porcelainlithia disilicateZirconiumzirconium oxide

Identifiers

PMID39455773
PMCPMC11511664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.