Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455733›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Model selection to achieve reproducible associations between resting state EEG features and autism.

William E Carson, Samantha Major, Harshitha Akkineni, Hannah Fung, Elias Peters, Kimberly L H Carpenter, Geraldine Dawson, David E Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William E CarsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Samantha MajorDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Harshitha AkkineniDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Hannah FungDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Elias PetersDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Kimberly L H CarpenterDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Geraldine DawsonDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
David E CarlsonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. david.carlson@duke.edu.

Funding

Recruitment and Assessment CoreP50HD093074 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT N COMPTON · 2017 to 2026
$27.6M
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation 23807 NARSAD Young Investigator GrantNICHD NIH HHS P50 HD093074NIH HHS P50HD093074Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Autism Research Program W81XWH-14-1-0526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A concern in the field of autism electroencephalography (EEG) biomarker discovery is their lack of reproducibility. In the present study, we considered the problem of learning reproducible associations between multiple features of resting state (RS) neural activity and autism, using EEG data collected during a RS paradigm from 36 to 96 month-old children diagnosed with autism (N = 224) and neurotypical children (N = 69). Specifically, EEG spectral power and functional connectivity features were used as inputs to a regularized generalized linear model trained to predict diagnostic group (autism versus neurotypical). To evaluate our model, we proposed a procedure that quantified both the predictive generalization and reproducibility of learned associations produced by the model. When prioritizing both model predictive performance and reproducibility of associations, a highly reproducible profile of associations emerged. This profile revealed a distinct pattern of increased gamma power and connectivity in occipital and posterior midline regions associated with an autism diagnosis. Conversely, model selection based on predictive performance alone resulted in non-robust associations. Finally, we built a custom machine learning model that further empirically improved robustness of learned associations. Our results highlight the need for model selection criteria that maximize the scientific utility provided by reproducibility instead of predictive performance.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderElectroencephalographyBrainChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleReproducibility of ResultsRestAutismEEGElectroencephalographyReproducibilityReproducibleResting state

Identifiers

PMID39455733
PMCPMC11511871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.