ArticleScientific reports2024
Experimental study on mechanical properties of 3D Printed layered rock like materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental and numerical simulation assessment of fracture evolution and tensile strength recovery in Grout-reinforced fractured surrounding rocks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study on the evolution law of failure depth of large mining height and ultra-wide working surface.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanical Properties and Crack Evolution of Rock-like Materials with Varying Particle Sizes Prepared by Impact and Static Compaction Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Layered rocks are prevalent in the Earth's crust and are frequently encountered in underground engineering construction. Due to their pronounced anisotropy, the deformation and failure mechanism of layered rock are complex. Laboratory tests are an effective way to study these mechanisms. However, natural layered rocks present challenges, such as difficult sampling and large discreteness. Additionally, current methods for creating layered rock models are often costly or lack precision, limiting research into their mechanical properties. In this study, a 3D printing process using wet material extrusion was adopted, with a wide range of material options and low production costs. Five layered model samples with bedding dip angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° were printed using this method. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted, supplemented by digital image correlation (DIC) to capture detailed stress-strain data and failure patterns. The results demonstrate that the mechanical properties of the 3D-printed samples closely resemble those of natural layered rocks and exhibit significant anisotropy. This approach presents a new cost-effective method for studying the mechanical behavior of layered rock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.