ArticleScientific reports2024
Modulation of memory by prism adaptation in healthy subjects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boosting executive functions and math abilities in adolescents with dyscalculia: the combined effect of prismatic adaptation and cognitive training.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Trial
- Preliminary Evidence of Biological and Cognitive Efficacy of Prismatic Adaptation Combined with Cognitive Training on Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Prism adaptation combined with serious games for improving visual-constructive abilities in stroke patients: randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Increasing affective distance - leftward prism adaptation amplifies alexithymia in healthy females.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent findings suggest that prism adaptation can extend its effects beyond spatial attention, modulating the performance of different cognitive tasks by acting on cerebellar, parietal and temporal-frontal networks. We tested groups of healthy subjects to investigate the effects of rightward vs. leftward prism adaptation vs. neutral lenses exposure in a series of memory tasks, probing either short-term (Digit span, Corsi span) or long-term memory (Supraspan verbal and spatial learning). In the short-term memory tasks, leftward prism adaptation selectively increased verbal span, while rightward prism adaptation increased spatial span. In the long-term memory tasks, leftward prism adaptation selectively increased verbal supraspan, i.e., increased the number of digits in the correct sequence reproduced and reduced the number of repetitions needed to learn the supraspan sequence. On the other hand, rightward prism adaptation selectively increased spatial supraspan, i.e. it increased the number of spatial positions in the correct sequence reproduced and reduced the number of repetitions needed to learn the supraspan sequence. Moreover, rightward, but not leftward, prism adaptation selectively increased supraspan recall after a delay interval, regardless of the stimulus material, i.e., it increased the number of digits or spatial positions recalled after a delay interval. Neutral lenses exposure did not influence any memory task. These findings suggest that prism adaptation can induce both modality/hemispheric-specific and process-specific effects on short-term and long-term explicit memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.