Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455689›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Visible feature engineering to detect fraud in black and red peppers.

Mohammad Hossein Nargesi, Kamran Kheiralipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deciphering Stress Resilience in Black Pepper (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Hossein NargesiMechanical Engineering of Biosystems Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Kamran KheiralipourMechanical Engineering of Biosystems Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. k.kheiralipour@ilam.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visible imaging is a fast, cheap, and accurate technique in the assessment of food quality and safety. The technique was used in the present research to detect sea foam adulterant levels in black and red peppers. The fraud levels included 0, 5, 15, 30, and 50%. Sample preparation, image acquisition and preprocessing, and feature engineering (feature extraction, selection, and classification) were the conducted steps in the present research. The efficient features were classified using artificial neural networks and support vector machine methods. The classifiers were evaluated using the specificity, sensitivity, precision, and accuracy metrics. The artificial neural networks had better results than the support vector machine method for the classification of different adulterant levels in black pepper with the metrics' values of 98.89, 95.67, 95.56, and 98.22%, respectively. Reversely, the support vector machine method had higher metrics' values (99.46, 98.00, 97.78, and 99.11%, respectively) for red pepper. The results showed the ability of visible imaging and machine learning methods to detect fraud levels in black and red pepper.

Indexed as

CapsicumNeural Networks, ComputerPiper nigrumSupport Vector MachineFood ContaminationFood QualityFraudArtificial intelligence.Feature engineeringFraud detectionImage processing

Identifiers

PMID39455689
PMCPMC11512034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.