ArticleScientific reports2024
Visible feature engineering to detect fraud in black and red peppers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid and non-destructive estimation of chemical properties of date syrup using visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning predictive models.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Deciphering Stress Resilience in Black Pepper (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visible imaging is a fast, cheap, and accurate technique in the assessment of food quality and safety. The technique was used in the present research to detect sea foam adulterant levels in black and red peppers. The fraud levels included 0, 5, 15, 30, and 50%. Sample preparation, image acquisition and preprocessing, and feature engineering (feature extraction, selection, and classification) were the conducted steps in the present research. The efficient features were classified using artificial neural networks and support vector machine methods. The classifiers were evaluated using the specificity, sensitivity, precision, and accuracy metrics. The artificial neural networks had better results than the support vector machine method for the classification of different adulterant levels in black pepper with the metrics' values of 98.89, 95.67, 95.56, and 98.22%, respectively. Reversely, the support vector machine method had higher metrics' values (99.46, 98.00, 97.78, and 99.11%, respectively) for red pepper. The results showed the ability of visible imaging and machine learning methods to detect fraud levels in black and red pepper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.